<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Browser Sync &#8211; privacy kiss of death?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://niklasblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://niklasblog.com/?p=986</link>
	<description>Giddup-a! Geddondown-a!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:52:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Niklas</title>
		<link>http://niklasblog.com/?p=986&#038;cpage=1#comment-8333</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 19:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://niklasblog.com/?p=986#comment-8333</guid>
		<description>First: \&quot;We offer some of our services in connection with other web sites.\&quot;

This may very well mean that they forward info to third parties.

Second: \&quot;In some cases, we may process personal information on behalf of and according to the instructions of a third party, such as our advertising partners.\&quot;

This &lt;i&gt;means&lt;/i&gt; they &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; using \&quot;personal information on behalf of and according to the instructions of a third party\&quot;.

As it is unclear to which \&quot;third paragraphy\&quot; you are referring, I hereby guess it\&#039;s the one starting with \&quot;This Privacy Policy\&quot;; Google are hereby saying they actually don\&#039;t care much what their partners do to collect your data, or, indeed, do with it.

I hope their level of encryption leaves everybody (including the US government, even though I think this, sadly, is not the case) other than the submitting user out of the data, but I\&#039;d like to see more info on this before I collect my thoughts further on the subject. A Google PGP-server would no doubt serve evil causes. ;-) Just kidding. [/tinfoil hat]

I\&#039;m guessing groups such as &lt;a href=\&quot;http://www.eff.org\&quot; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EFF&lt;/a&gt; and companies as &lt;a href=\&quot;http://www.winternals.com\&quot; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Winternals&lt;/a&gt; will soon enough give their pennies\&#039; worth on this subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First: \&#8221;We offer some of our services in connection with other web sites.\&#8221;</p>
<p>This may very well mean that they forward info to third parties.</p>
<p>Second: \&#8221;In some cases, we may process personal information on behalf of and according to the instructions of a third party, such as our advertising partners.\&#8221;</p>
<p>This <i>means</i> they <i>are</i> using \&#8221;personal information on behalf of and according to the instructions of a third party\&#8221;.</p>
<p>As it is unclear to which \&#8221;third paragraphy\&#8221; you are referring, I hereby guess it\&#8217;s the one starting with \&#8221;This Privacy Policy\&#8221;; Google are hereby saying they actually don\&#8217;t care much what their partners do to collect your data, or, indeed, do with it.</p>
<p>I hope their level of encryption leaves everybody (including the US government, even though I think this, sadly, is not the case) other than the submitting user out of the data, but I\&#8217;d like to see more info on this before I collect my thoughts further on the subject. A Google PGP-server would no doubt serve evil causes. <img src='http://niklasblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Just kidding. [/tinfoil hat]</p>
<p>I\&#8217;m guessing groups such as <a href=\"http://www.eff.org\" rel=\"nofollow\" rel="nofollow">EFF</a> and companies as <a href=\"http://www.winternals.com\" rel=\"nofollow\" rel="nofollow">Winternals</a> will soon enough give their pennies\&#8217; worth on this subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duh</title>
		<link>http://niklasblog.com/?p=986&#038;cpage=1#comment-8332</link>
		<dc:creator>Duh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://niklasblog.com/?p=986#comment-8332</guid>
		<description>Nowhere does it say that Google is forwarding info to third parties.  The privacy portion of the third party paragraph is just stating they aren&#039;t responsible for sites not owned by Google, (duh??), but linked from them (ie from search results).

Seems perfectly reasonable to me. Also, from what I can tell their use of encryption is a public/private key which will make it impossible for them to unencrypt your files.

Of course, Vista likes to phone home to MSFT every day too, so what can you do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nowhere does it say that Google is forwarding info to third parties.  The privacy portion of the third party paragraph is just stating they aren&#8217;t responsible for sites not owned by Google, (duh??), but linked from them (ie from search results).</p>
<p>Seems perfectly reasonable to me. Also, from what I can tell their use of encryption is a public/private key which will make it impossible for them to unencrypt your files.</p>
<p>Of course, Vista likes to phone home to MSFT every day too, so what can you do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
